Skip to main content

Thoughts on NGOs and the Opinion on Party Building in Social Organizations

On September 28 the CCP General Office issued the Opinion on the Work of Strengthening Party Building in Social Organizations (for trial implementation) [here, in Chinese]. The Opinion mandates the establishment of Party leading groups in all social organizations, a broad term which includes foreign-funded NGOs. 

I am not translating or summarizing the Opinion. A partial translation is already available on China Law Translate, and I invite all those interested to contribute to it. Summaries of the Opinion will be published very soon by the finest scholars in the field of Chinese civil society. Coming, as it does, in the immediate aftermath of the debate over the Foreign NGOs Management Law (a debate about which I have written  elsewhere) the Opinion might be seen as the latest move in a sustained attempt to suffocate the foreign-funded non-profit sector in China. 

A similar interpretation would be consistent with the premises of an interpretive scheme postulating that any legislative or regulatory move by the CCP ought to be seen with suspicion and skepticism. Sometimes, an hermeneutics of suspicion is necessary to understand what a political or legal document really means. But, sometimes interpretations based on skepticism and suspicion can lead one to overlook more important dynamics. 



The existence of Party leading groups or Party committees, within each public or private institution is a normal feature of an admittedly Leninist system as the People's Republic of China. 

A Leninist system that did not deeply reach into the society it governs would be comparable to a tree without roots. If Party committees are the tree's main roots, Party leading groups in social organizations are similar to smaller roots, or to the microvascular system of the human body. From this point of view, this far the anomaly has been the absence of Party groups from Chinese and foreign-funded NGOs. 

Given the requirement to supervise social organizations, direct supervision by a Party group is preferable to supervision by non-Party organs. Institutionalized supervision can guarantee a greater regularity and predictability of NGOs operations. This is an only seeming paradox...

The Opinion is, like the Foreign NGOs Management Law, nothing really new or unexpected. Neither it is incoherent with the logic of the PRC political/legal system. This document is a further step towards the completion of the CCP's regulatory system. 

Chapter 9 of the CCP Statute mandates the creation of Party leading groups or committees in each central or local economic or cultural institution, or non-Party entity. 




第九章 党 组

第四十六条 在中央和地方国家机关、人民团体、经济组织、文化组织和其他非党组织的领导机关中,可以成立党组。党组发挥领导核心作用。党组的任务,主要是负责贯彻执行党的路线、方针、政策;讨论和决定本单位的重大问题;做好干部管理工作;团结党外干部和群众,完成党和国家交给的任务;指导机关和直属单位党组织的工作。

第四十七条 党组的成员,由批准成立党组的党组织决定。党组设书记,必要时还可以设副书记。

党组必须服从批准它成立的党组织领导。

第四十八条 对下属单位实行集中统一领导的国家工作部门可以建立党委,党委的产生办法、职权和工作任务,由中央另行规定。



Chapter IX Leading Party Members' Groups

Article 46. A leading Party members' group may be formed in the leading body of a central or local state organ, people's organization, economic or cultural institution or other non-Party unit. The group plays the role of the core of leadership. Its main tasks are: to see to it that the Party's line, principles and policies are implemented, to discuss and decide on matters of major importance in its unit, to do well in cadre management, to rally the non-Party cadres and the masses in fulfilling the tasks assigned by the Party and the state and to guide the work of the Party organization of the unit and those directly under it.

Article 47. The composition of a leading Party members' group is decided by the Party organization that approves its establishment. The group shall have a secretary and, if necessary, deputy secretaries.

A leading Party members' group must accept the leadership of the Party organization that approves its establishment.

Article 48. Party committees may be set up in state organs which exercise centralized leadership over their subordinate units. The Central Committee of the Party shall provide the specific procedure for their establishment and define their functions, powers and tasks.



The first attempts in this direction were made already in 1998, with the issuance of the Central Organization Department and Ministry of Civil Affairs Notice on the Problem of Establishing Party groups in Social Organizations [here, in Chinese]. Two years later, in 2000, the Central Organization Department enacted the Opinion on Strengthening the Construction of Party Groups in Social Organizations [here, in Chinese]. As it has happened in the case of the Foreign NGOs Management Law, earlier developments went largely unnoticed. 


What most seem to have missed is that we are in the midst of a process where, for the first time in the history of the PRC, the entire Party regulatory system is undergoing a systematic reform. The path and content of reforms is described in the Outline of the Central Committee's Five-Years Plan on the Issuance of Party Legislation 2013 - 2017 [here, in Chinese].Article 2, Paragraph 2 of the Plan calls for standardizing the system of leading Party groups, and for enacting the CCP Regulations on the Work of Leading Party Groups, which would fill the gaps in the 1998 and 2000 documents. 


As the CCP Legislative Plan mentions, the Regulations on the Work of  Leading Party Groups should clarify the relationship between Party groups and non-Party entities as judicial organs, but also local governments, local people's congresses and so on. 
规范和完善党组工作制度。抓紧制定《中国共产党党组工作条例》,明确党组的设立、职权职责和工作方式,规范党组决策程序,进一步理顺党组与所在机构组织的关系,既支持人大、政府、政协、司法机关、人民团体依照法律和各自章程独立负责、协调一致地开展工作,支持国有企业和事业单位依法运营,又发挥党组在这些机构组织中的领导核心作用,保证党的路线方针政策和决策部署得到落实。
A trial version of the Regulations was already enacted in June, and it is available here [in Chinese]. The Opinion represents a further step in the direction set by the CCP Legislative Plan, and could result in a greater autonomy and ease of operations for the more than 600.000 officially registered social organizations. 





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Internship Opportunities at the Foundation for Law and International Affairs

I am delighted to share a call for internship issued by the Foundation for Law and International Affairs, an organization I am a proud member of.



FLIA Internship Opportunity

We are looking for interns from all over the world.

Who we are and what we do
FLIA is an independent nonprofit organization established in Washington, DC in 2015. As an educational and consultative think tank, FLIA is devoted to promoting global communication, cooperation, and education in the field of law and international affairs. The areas on which FLIA focuses include comparative law and culture, international crime and judicial assistance, courts and tribunals, social responsibility and sustainable development, global economics and world trade, international relations and multilateral diplomacy, global security and governance, and human rights. FLIA conducts various programs such as FLIA Conference, FLIA Dialogue, FLIA Insight, FLIA Youth, FLIA Publication, and FLIA Blog. 
Why be a FLIA intern
If you are seeking to…

A Short Response to a Reader

This post provides a short and simple response to a question I received about my short essay "民法的一般原则、党组以及“一带一路”  (available here for those who may like to read it in Chinese, and here for those who may like to read it in English). The question was received on the "法律与国际事务学会" Wechat group, following the circulation of this short essay on Chinese-language internet groups and websites. 

I am publishing my short and simple reply here because the question may be of interest to persons other than the reader who asked it (and whom shall remain anonymous). Also, my essay was written for the sole purpose of academic research and communication therefore, there is no reason why I should provide my answer within the 'four walls' of a social media group.
Question: In your commentary, you wrote “in 1957, Liu Shaoqi suggested to use the words ‘militant bastions’ in article 19 of the Constitution of the CPC to refer to the function of primary organizations, rather than to their …

Short Essay: 民法的一般原则、党组以及“一带一路”

The following short essay was produced as part of a series of commentaries on the General Provisions of Civil Law authored for the Chinese and Western public. It examines how the General Provisions of Civil Law can contribute to the construction of a transnational rule of law framework for the Belt and Road Initiative. In the essay, I discuss the General Provisions of Civil Law in relation to the legal status of Party groups in SOEs, private enterprises, and social organizations (including NGOs and Foundations) operating in China and in Western countries. My most heartfelt thanks go to Luo Qiyue and Huang Linlin, for their outstanding translation of my essay. 




民法的一般原则、党组以及“一带一路” 作者:Flora Sapio1

自党的十八大以来,国家采取了数个措施来增强党在国有企业、私有企业和社会组织中的权威。2013年《中央党内法规制定工作五年规划纲要(2013—2017年)》第二条要求规范和完善党组工作制度,并且制定有关党组工作的党内法规。2014年党的十八届三中全会亦提出要加强建设以提供服务,学习及创新为导向的党组。
为了应对经济发展所提出的一系列全新需求,强化党组是必不可少的。这些新的需求包括加强对公司的内部审计、监督公司高层以及员工行为的合法性、寻找多种途径解决劳动纠纷以及更好地向公众提供公共服务等。
为了使得党组在上述及其他领域发挥根本性作用,党的十八届中央委员会创建了一个法律框架来规范党组构成及其活动。…