Skip to main content

Invitation to collaborate: "Legal Problems of Renewing the Term of the Right to Use Land for Construction of Dwellings."




The Foundation for Law and International Affairs is launching an exciting new project on "Legal Problems of Renewing the Term of the Right to Use Land for the Construction of Dwellings". In this post, I am sharing FLIA's call to collaborate, which is addressed to legal scholars at any stage of their carriers, and from any jurisdiction. For further information, the complete call can be found here

FLIA invites you to join the Comparative Research Project: Legal Problems of Renewing the Term of the Right to Use Land for Construction of Dwellings.

Background


The right to use land for construction of dwellings is a relatively new legal term in China. Recently, the legal problem of renewing the term of the right to use land for construction of dwellings after it expires has become a major concern for the public. 

There are two legal grounds governing this issue. One is the Property Law, which was adopted at the 5th session of the Tenth National People's Congress on March 16, 2007 and promulgated for effect as of October 1, 2007. The other is the Interim Regulations of the People's Republic ofChina Concerning the Assignment and Transfer of the Right to the Use of the State-owned Land in the Urban Areas, which is promulgated in accordance by Decree No. 55 of the State Council of the People's Republic of China on May 19, 1990 and effective as of the date of promulgation.

In the Property Law of China, article 149 states that the term of the right to use land for construction of dwellings shall be automatically renewed upon expiration.

In Interim Regulations of the People's Republic of China Concerning the Assignment and Transfer of the Right to the Use of the State-owned Land in the Urban Areas, Article 8 states: “The assignment of the right to the use of the land refers to the act of the State as the owner of the land who, within the term of a certain number of years, assigns the right to the use of the land to land users, who shall in turn pay fees for the assignment thereof to the State. An assignment contract shall be signed for assigning the right to the use of the land.” 

Article 10 states: “The land administration departments under the people's governments at the municipal and county levels shall, in conjunction with the administrative departments for urban planning and construction and the housing administration departments, draw up a plan concerning the size and location, the purposes, the term, and other conditions with respect to the assigning of the right to the use of the land. The plan shall be submitted for approval in accordance with the limits of authority for approval as stipulated by the State Council and shall then the implemented by the land administration departments.”

Article 12 states: “The maximum term with respect to the assigned right to the use of the land shall be determined respectively in the light of the purposes listed below: (1) 70 years for residential purposes; ......” 

None of the articles mentions how to renew the term of the right to use land for construction of dwellings when it expires. This leads to a serious problem to today. The very first generation that was assigned the right to use the residential land has encountered the problem that the term of the right for 20 years is now expiring. As there is no law made by the Congress or regulation made by the central government explaining what to do with the expiration, the legal grounds to deal with this issues lie in local regulations. In the city of Wenzhou, the government decided that a homeowner has to pay hundreds of thousands or even millions to renew the assigned right to use the land. Meanwhile, in the city of Shenzhen, the government announced that homeowners can renew the right for 70 years for free.
Therefore, a huge debate is going on in China on what should be the legitimate and appropriate way to deal with this issue. This problem not only relates to vital interests of the people but also relates to how the legislators will solve the same problems with lands for industrial, commercial and other purposes. What more, it has serious implications for Chinese people and corporations, as well as foreign investors who must anticipate future costs. 


The Foundation for Law and International Affairs (FLIA) is an independent, nonpartisan, nonprofit organization mandated to promote academic and public discourse at the intersection of law and international affairs. The core vision of FLIA is to promote international cooperation and public dialogue through the development of new ideas and collaboration with various academic, governmental and civil actors.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Internship Opportunities at the Foundation for Law and International Affairs

I am delighted to share a call for internship issued by the Foundation for Law and International Affairs, an organization I am a proud member of.



FLIA Internship Opportunity

We are looking for interns from all over the world.

Who we are and what we do
FLIA is an independent nonprofit organization established in Washington, DC in 2015. As an educational and consultative think tank, FLIA is devoted to promoting global communication, cooperation, and education in the field of law and international affairs. The areas on which FLIA focuses include comparative law and culture, international crime and judicial assistance, courts and tribunals, social responsibility and sustainable development, global economics and world trade, international relations and multilateral diplomacy, global security and governance, and human rights. FLIA conducts various programs such as FLIA Conference, FLIA Dialogue, FLIA Insight, FLIA Youth, FLIA Publication, and FLIA Blog. 
Why be a FLIA intern
If you are seeking to…

A Short Response to a Reader

This post provides a short and simple response to a question I received about my short essay "民法的一般原则、党组以及“一带一路”  (available here for those who may like to read it in Chinese, and here for those who may like to read it in English). The question was received on the "法律与国际事务学会" Wechat group, following the circulation of this short essay on Chinese-language internet groups and websites. 

I am publishing my short and simple reply here because the question may be of interest to persons other than the reader who asked it (and whom shall remain anonymous). Also, my essay was written for the sole purpose of academic research and communication therefore, there is no reason why I should provide my answer within the 'four walls' of a social media group.
Question: In your commentary, you wrote “in 1957, Liu Shaoqi suggested to use the words ‘militant bastions’ in article 19 of the Constitution of the CPC to refer to the function of primary organizations, rather than to their …

Short Essay: 民法的一般原则、党组以及“一带一路”

The following short essay was produced as part of a series of commentaries on the General Provisions of Civil Law authored for the Chinese and Western public. It examines how the General Provisions of Civil Law can contribute to the construction of a transnational rule of law framework for the Belt and Road Initiative. In the essay, I discuss the General Provisions of Civil Law in relation to the legal status of Party groups in SOEs, private enterprises, and social organizations (including NGOs and Foundations) operating in China and in Western countries. My most heartfelt thanks go to Luo Qiyue and Huang Linlin, for their outstanding translation of my essay. 




民法的一般原则、党组以及“一带一路” 作者:Flora Sapio1

自党的十八大以来,国家采取了数个措施来增强党在国有企业、私有企业和社会组织中的权威。2013年《中央党内法规制定工作五年规划纲要(2013—2017年)》第二条要求规范和完善党组工作制度,并且制定有关党组工作的党内法规。2014年党的十八届三中全会亦提出要加强建设以提供服务,学习及创新为导向的党组。
为了应对经济发展所提出的一系列全新需求,强化党组是必不可少的。这些新的需求包括加强对公司的内部审计、监督公司高层以及员工行为的合法性、寻找多种途径解决劳动纠纷以及更好地向公众提供公共服务等。
为了使得党组在上述及其他领域发挥根本性作用,党的十八届中央委员会创建了一个法律框架来规范党组构成及其活动。…